top of page
Duška Radosavljević

Theatre Preview: Dead Centre's “Chekhov's First Play” [UK, Ireland]


 

“I’M HAVING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE THEATRE OR THE HUMAN RACE. THEY CAN ALL GO TO HELL.”

Anton Chekhov

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

Also known as Platonov or the Play Without A Title, Chekhov’s first playtext, written when he was 18 and never published during his lifetime, is a complex prototype version of all of his four most famous plays. It is a play with some production history in the English-speaking world (sometimes in Michael Frayn’s adaptation as Wild Honey), though not one that has any particularly memorable precursors in recent years. It is a problem play, often chosen by adaptors and directors for its problem-solving potential.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

Dead Centre’s version is different. It is smartly named Chekhov’s First Play, and the textual authorship credit is apportioned between Chekhov and the directors Kidd and Moukarzel, making it clear this is no one’s vanity project. Neither is this an act of directorial assertion of authorship over the original text, or a clumsy suggestion of an adaptation. Instead one could qualify it as a three-way conversation with the original–a collaboration of sorts, an ensemble riff on beginnings.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

The play opens with a direct address from director Bush Moukarzel standing on stage and speaking through a microphone that feeds into the headphones provided at each seat. Worried that we won’t understand Chekhov’s youthful ramblings, now additionally removed from us by history and geography, the director will give us a helpful DVD-style running commentary.

“For those who are used to having a voice in their head, this is like having two voices in your head.”

Game on–the audience is immediately up for it.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

Moukarzel informs us of the finer details of the plot, subtext, cuts he has made, casting, even some inter-personal gossip regarding his company. Property and greed are foregrounded as the main theme of Chekhov’s play, and later we will be offered ways of reading these themes in relation to the times we live in and present-day Ireland, the home of Dead Centre as a company.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

The Irish connection seems important to note here on a number of levels. Moukarzel speaks with an English accent, however, he has made Ireland his base, and the same is the case with his directorial partner Ben Kidd with whom he co-founded Dead Centre in 2012. Their early piece, Lippy (2013), was an understated tribute to Beckett, displaying a strong commitment to a fusion of the verbal, the visual and conceptual in their engagement with stagecraft–an approach still underlying the company’s work.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

On this occasion too, every aspect of the design is meticulously thought-through in relation to the central concept–the idea that ultimately less is more. And this idea is taken to extremes–silence-noise, presence-absence, possession-dispossession, comedy-tragedy, simplicity-complexity, life-death. Somewhere along the line, in this process of calibration, poignant moments of beauty and insight, elegantly shine through.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

It is an extraordinarily rich and layered piece which requires more than one viewing to properly appreciate its facets. It’s as though, in condemning greed, Kidd and Moukarzel’s work creates a sense of aesthetic insatiety itself.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

Describing the work’s various moments of poetry and wit, therefore, does not do it justice, as the piece is primarily designed to be experienced. But I will say this–it is Chekhov like you have never seen it in the English-speaking world before. Totally true to its source, totally authentic in its execution. Although at times Chekhov’s First Play may resemble the regietheater of the German tradition, it is, in fact, an entirely autonomous achievement, whose aesthetic completely clearly emerges from its own deliberations.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

This is where my review, like most others, has to stop short of revealing the central dramaturgical decision the work is based on. However, for the sake of posterity, I will add a spoilery post-scriptum–only for those who have already seen the show or are not in a position to ever see it again.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

What I have described above regarding the director’s DVD commentary to the piece turns out to be only a smart overture to the piece. Most of the first act of Chekhov’s Platonov serves to set up the mysterious title character’s arrival. Everyone’s third-person account of Platonov adds to this sense of anticipation–and this, the directors seem to have decided, is the play’s only most interesting feature.

Halfway through Dead Centre’s version, Moukarzel reminds us of his own (and indeed Chekhov’s) authorial ambitions for new forms of theatre and new ways of connecting to audiences; at this point, the conceit that has been painstakingly established is smashed with a burning cannonball flying through the set. A light shines on an audience member, who rises from his seat, a hypnotic score drowns out Moukarzel’s voice and from this point on we are sucked into a dreamlike state in which we witness our representative (the randomly chosen audience member) walk and dance and play their way through the piece, the only competence for their actions seemingly drawn from the director’s voice that must still be coming through their headphones.

Photo by : Adam Trigg

 

The effect is a strange combination of reality and construct, the kind Chekhov must indeed have been aiming for but never thought possible with the available technology of his age. Platonov’s expositional absence is fully justified by this surprising entrance from the end of the auditorium elided into oblivion by the proverbial fourth wall. As we reach the end, in which the ensemble has reached the Russian roulette moment, Moukarzel speaks to us again. There is that famous quotation of Chekhov’s he is yet to finish–that if you see a gun at the opening of act one, by the end of the play it must be fired. But wait for this: all of Chekhov’s plays except the last one, Moukarzel informs us, have a gun in them:

“He wrote away the gun–his characters needed to learn to do something worse than dying.”

More a philosophical treatise than a straightforward theatre production, Kidd and Moukarzel’s fun-filled creation is both a contribution to the glittering annals of Chekohvian production histories and to the proliferating genre of immersive performance, but above all a key benchmark for any aspiring theatre-maker to see and think about.

CHEKHOV’S FIRST PLAY BATTERSEA ARTS CENTRE DATES: OCTOBER 31 – NOVEMBER 10

Text by: Anton Chekhov, Ben Kidd, Bush Moukarzel Cast: Andrew Bennett, Tara Egan-Langley, Clara Simpson, Dylan Tighe, Breffni Holahan, Liam Carney Set Design: Andrew Clancy Effects and onstage design: Grace O’Hara Costumes: Saileog O’Halloran Light: Stephen Dodd Sound Design: Jimmy Eddie and Kevin Gleeson Choreography: Liv O’Donoghue Direction: Ben Kidd and Bush Moukarzel Producer: Aisling Ormonde

The article has been published by permission from The Theatre Times and author Duska Radosavljevic, originally published here.

 

Duška Radosavljević

REGIONAL MANAGING EDITOR - UNITED KINGDOM at The THEATRE TIMES

d.radosavljevic@thetheatretimes.com

Duška Radosavljević is a writer, dramaturg and academic. She is the author of the award-winning Theatre-Making: Interplay Between Text and Performance in the 21st Century (2013) and editor of The Contemporary Ensemble (2013) and Theatre Criticism: Changing Landscapes (2016). She teaches at the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama.

 

33 views0 comments
bottom of page